
Wednesday, May 3, 2006
CRITIC’S NOTEBOOK
String Quartets Reveal the Private Shostakovich
By Anthony Tommasini
Almost by default, the string quartet is the most intimate of musical
genres, intended for performance in intimate spaces. The music is laid
out in four voices, one instrument per voice, and the string
instruments are all of the same sound world. Even when Haydn creates
mischief in his string quartets, there is something tender and wistful
about the humor. And when Bartok goes to the dark side in his quartets,
the pulverized, vehement and dissonant music somehow sounds
confessional.
So it’s not surprising that Shostakovich, the most inscrutable composer
of the 20th century, seems at his most revealing in his 15 string
quartets. Some commentators are cautious about seeing these works this
way, among them Eric Bromberger, who wrote the excellent program notes
for the Alexander String Quartet’s survey of the Shostakovich quartets.
That five-concert series ended on Monday at the Baruch Performing Arts
Center.
It can be no coincidence that Shostakovich wrote 15 symphonies and 15
string quartets. But Mr. Bromberger is correct that it oversimplifies
things to see the symphonies as Shostakovich’s public statements and
the quartets as his private ones. After all, there are inconsolable
passages in the symphonies and episodes of genial Neo-Classicism in the
quartets.
Yet given the nature of the genre, Shostakovich could not help letting
his deepest feelings come out. It goes with the territory. The intimacy
of the music came through with enhanced power and poignancy in the
Alexander quartet’s vibrant, probing, assured and aptly volatile
performances, given in an ideal hall for chamber music that seats just
174.
The confessional nature of certain Shostakovich quartets is impossible
to ignore. He suppressed the Fourth, in D, and the Fifth, in B flat,
written in 1949 and 1952, rightly fearing that the music was too
anguished and dangerously modern at a time when the Soviet Union’s
cultural police were cracking down on musical expression.
Publicly Shostakovich was forced to write paeans to the state, like the
cantata “The Sun Shines Over Our Motherland.” Privately he wrote these
quartets, which were not performed until after Stalin’s death in 1953.
The Fifth teems with astringent harmonies, bouts of anger, obsessive
repetitions and a waltz movement so long-winded and convoluted that you
don’t for a moment trust its graceful pose.
Sometimes the quartets seem revealing despite themselves. The Quartet
No. 6, in G, was composed in 1956, during the first month of
Shostakovich’s marriage to his second wife, a captivating party
official. His troubled first marriage to Nina Varzar, a physicist,
ended with her death in 1954. The Sixth Quartet is sunny: the music of
a middle-aged man in love with a young wife, it would seem. Yet despite
its playful character, it is structurally rigorous and elusive. Did
Shostakovich subliminally known better? Within three years the marriage
had ended in divorce.
The renowned Eighth Quartet, in C minor, was composed in 1960, when
Shostakovich went to Dresden. The city was still blighted from the
devastating Allied bombing in 1945. He dedicated this powerfully bleak
work “to the memory of the victims of fascism and war.”
Yet Laurel Fay, in her acclaimed biography of Shostakovich, amasses
persuasive evidence that he was overcome at the time with premonitions
of death and perhaps thoughts of suicide. In a letter to a friend,
written days after he had finished the work, he called it an
“ideologically deficient quartet that nobody needs” and described it as
his own memorial. The quotations from other works in this score (the
Cello Concerto No. 1 and several symphonies) seem a summing up.
Shostakovich, who was not a string player, did not compose his first
quartet until 1938, when he was 32. But by his last decade (he died in
1975, at 68), the genre was at the center of his output. The last five
quartets date from those years.
The Alexander String Quartet, based in San Francisco, is celebrating
its 25th anniversary. The first violinist, the excellent Zakarias
Grafilo, joined in 2002. The other members are Frederick Lifsitz,
second violinist; Paul Yarbrough, violist; and Sandy Wilson, cellist.
They have recorded the works for Foghorn Classics; the first volume was
recently released, the second is imminent.
On Monday night the Alexander players showed understandable signs of
fatigue after their weeklong Shostakovich marathon. Occasionally their
concentration slipped, notably in the tragically elegiac final work.
But the chance to experience all 15 quartets played in chronological
order with such intensity and engrossing commitment in a perfect
chamber music hall was a privilege.
The Emerson String Quartet, whose justly praised recording of the
Shostakovich quartets was released six years ago by Deutsche
Grammophon, is nearing the midpoint of its five-concert survey of the
15 works at Alice Tully Hall, which, at nearly 1,100 seats, is far too
big a space. Still, the Emerson players are immersed in these works,
and their series remains a major event of the season.
For my part, having heard seven programs of Shostakovich quartets on
seven consecutive days, far from feeling drained, I was transported.